| Study 3: John 2:1-25 |
|
|
STUDY 3: JOHN 2:1-25 – THREE KEY ISSUESCopyright © Rosemary Bardsley 2009At first glance Chapter 2 does not seem to contain very much, compared with the intense and sustained teaching and debates reported by John in many chapters. But in this chapter John focuses on three significant issues in the life of Christ: the role of Christ’s miracles, Christ’s concern for his Father’s honour and glory, and the problem of inappropriate or false responses to his words and his works. A. ISSUE ONE: THE MIRACLES OF JESUSIn 2:1-11 John reports Jesus’ first miracle. It is easy to wonder here: what is the point? Why do we need to know this? It’s just a wedding party. It’s just a face-saving result for the host. No one’s life or health depended on it. No undoing of the effects or impacts of the Genesis 3 condemnation or curse is involved. A.1 John’s comments on this miracle John tells us two things about this first miracle:
A.2 The impact of the miracles For John, the miracles of Jesus were ‘signs’. He does not record many specific details, but when he does report them he does so with the intention that these ‘signs’ will generate genuine belief in Jesus as the Christ, the Son of God. He also points out the incongruity of two things: [1] the failure of these signs to generate faith, and [2] the fact that on a number of occasions these signs generated false or fake faith.
From these references, and those in the next section, we understand clearly that the only appropriate response to the miracles of Jesus is the acknowledgement that he is indeed the One he claimed to be: God in human flesh, the divine Son of the Father, co-equal and co-eternal with the Father, worthy of the same honour as the Father. A.3 John’s references to the miracles of Jesus as ‘works’ As you study John’s Gospel you will notice Jesus repeatedly referring to his ‘works’. It is clear that he believes that his works are the works of God, his Father, and that these works are his normal, divine activity. As far as he is concerned, his ‘works’ speak for themselves. The amazing thing, to him, is not that he actually does these works, but that people seeing these works do not recognize them as the works of God, and from that recognition also recognize that he, Jesus, is the divine Son of the Father. The table below contains a selection of relevant references to the ‘work’ or ‘works’ of Jesus in John’s Gospel.
A.4 Spiritual lessons from the miracle at Cana Quite apart from the role of the miracles of Jesus in John’s Gospel, there are specific significances that we can draw from this particular miracle at Cana , just as there are from each of the other miracles that John reports in detail. [1] In this miracle Jesus reveals his transforming power. Leon Morris states points out that [2] We can note that this miracle also focuses on the transcendent quality of the ‘new’: The new wine is recognised as far superior to the old. Even so the new covenant ushered in by Jesus Christ surpasses the old covenant. All the way through this Gospel the Jews would seek to hem Jesus in to their traditional interpretations and expectations; equally all the way through Jesus will refuse to be confined to these expectations. In him the ‘new’ thing that God had promised to do would be brought into effect. [3] Jesus used the symbolism of a wedding feast when teaching about the kingdom of God . See Matt. 22:1-14; 25:1-13. Unlike Matthew and Mark, John makes no reference to Jesus preaching ‘the kingdom of heaven is at hand’; he reports none of Christ’s many parables about ‘the kingdom’. But here at this wedding feast he silently proclaims his kingdom, a kingdom that ‘flesh’ cannot enter [John 3:3,5] and that is ‘not of this world’ [John 18:36] by means of this seemingly pointless, earthbound, fleshy miracle. By this time/space miracle he initiates his eternal/spiritual kingdom ministry. B. ISSUE TWO: THE HONOUR AND GLORY OF GOD THE FATHERB.1 The cleansing of the temple There were probably two occasions on which Jesus cleansed the Temple - one at the beginning of his ministry [John 2:12 -16] and one at the end of his ministry when he entered Jerusalem during the final week [Matthew 21:12f; Mark 11:15-17; Luke 19:45f]. Irrespective of whether there were two or one, the key issue for Christ is his concern for his Father’s honour. For the Jews looking on the key issue was the authority of Jesus to do such a thing [ 2:18 ]. In responding to the Jew’s demand for a sign to prove his authority, Jesus referred to his body as ‘this temple’ [ 2:19 -22]. And here we are confronted by an important perspective: B.2 The temple of God The temple in Jerusalem [and, previously, the tabernacle] was the place where the glory of God was displayed to his people. There he met with them. There his eternal and holy presence was symbolised [2Chronicles 6:39 ].
Here, in John 2, Jesus dealt severely with those who had dishonoured God by dishonouring his ‘Father’s house’. But, lest we give too much significance to the physical temple, the New Testament teaches us that this physical temple, great and magnificent though it was, was a mere symbol of a greater reality. The greater spiritual reality anticipated and embedded in the physical temple is twofold: [1] That Jesus Christ is the real presence of God on earth. In Christ the glory of God is seen by man; in Christ God dwells among us, not in symbolic form as in the physical temple, but in reality. This man, Jesus, is God dwelling among us, pitching his tent among us. Here we no longer deal with a symbolic presence, but a real incarnation.
[2] That those who believe in Christ, are, both individually and corporately, the dwelling place of God. This is the second spiritual reality symbolised and anticipated in the physical temple.
This high and holy role or calling of the believer as the dwelling place of God has a flow-on effect: that we, as Christians, are, and are to be, the place where God is honoured, the place where his glory is present and is seen:
C. ISSUE THREE: FALSE BELIEFWhen we engage in witness, preaching or teaching it is very easy to blame the various responses on our inadequate presentation of God’s truth. But here, and elsewhere, we see that Jesus, who was himself ‘the truth’, and in whom there was no error or lack of understanding, is confronted with the issue of inappropriate responses. This failure to respond appropriately, either with negative responses or with fake, superficial responses, draws repeated comments from John. Never does he attribute it to any inadequacy in the message. Rather the fault lies in the hearer. Here in John 2:23-25 we read that many people ‘believed in his name’ [23] when they say the miraculous signs he was doing, but that Jesus, for his part, did not believe [that is the exact meaning of the Greek text] in them [24]. Here we have an outward expression of belief in his name, but Jesus, knowing what was in their hearts [24,25] knew that that obvious expression was not the kind of faith he sought. Some expression of ‘faith’ was made and was evident, but Jesus knew that it was not genuine.
Inappropriate, or false, belief is inevitable. People do and will either reject Jesus, or respond to him with a superficial faith grounded in unbiblical reasons and perceptions. Such faith is not, and never was, saving faith. Jesus was quite aware of this. While on the one hand he condemns their unbelief and their wrong belief, on the other hand he understands it even better than the people in question. While on the one hand he strives to bring people to genuine biblical faith, on the other hand he acknowledges and accepts the reality that some people’s apparent faith is not at all the faith that is required. A clear evidence of this is seen in Jesus’ comments about Judas Iscariot [6:66-71; 13:10 -11; 17:12 ].
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Website design and Web development by Allbutt The Best Christian designer.